Uncategorized

History has a way of reminding us that public health decisions are rarely simple. When a new technology, chemical substance, or industrial process emerges, society often faces the same difficult balance: how do we encourage innovation while protecting people from potential harm? The answer is rarely obvious. Scientific knowledge develops gradually. Regulations require careful evaluation. […]

Endocrine disruptors are no longer a niche topic reserved for scientists. Over the past decade, scientific studies have multiplied, health authorities have raised concerns, and consumers have become increasingly aware of their presence in everyday products, from cosmetics and food packaging to household cleaners and personal care items. Yet one phenomenon stands out: silence. Recently,

In an industry where formulations often change only when regulations demand it, some decisions deserve recognition. French fragrance house Marc-Antoine Barrois announced that it has removed BHT and UV filters from its perfumes. It is a bold move, technically demanding, and one that deserves genuine praise. More importantly, it proves that a different approach to

Endocrine disruptors are substances capable of interfering with hormonal signalling, potentially affecting growth, reproduction, metabolism, or development. In our previous article, we followed sunscreen UV filters from our skin to rivers, lakes, and oceans. But their journey doesn’t end there. Once these chemicals enter aquatic ecosystems, they continue interacting with living organisms and growing evidence

Luxury brands rarely communicate about endocrine disruptors. Instead, they talk about innovation, excellence, sustainability and product safety. LVMH is no exception. Through its LIFE 360 environmental programme, the world’s leading luxury group presents itself as a company that places scientific expertise, ingredient safety and environmental responsibility at the heart of product development. Its public commitments

Since our previous update, we have continued contacting additional decision-makers across the cosmetics and luxury sectors regarding the presence of endocrine disruptors in consumer products and the industry’s responsibility to address these concerns transparently. To date, we have not received substantive responses. Again, silence persists. And frankly, this silence is increasingly difficult to understand. The

We said we would keep tracking. We meant it. Since our previous update, we have continued contacting additional decision-makers across the cosmetics and luxury sectors regarding the presence of endocrine disruptors in consumer products and the industry’s responsibility to address these concerns transparently. To date, we have not received substantive responses. Again, silence persists. And

Following our previous outreach to L’Oréal, LVMH, and Hermès regarding the presence of endocrine-disrupting substances in cosmetic products, we have continued this campaign by contacting Chanel. To date, we have received no response. Once again, despite the seriousness of the concerns raised, despite the scientific evidence available, and despite the public health implications involved, silence

Essential Protection… With Hidden Limits Sunscreens have become a daily essential. They protect the skin from sunburn, slow down premature aging, and reduce the risk of skin cancer caused by ultraviolet radiation. For years, dermatologists and health authorities have strongly encouraged their use. But behind this essential protection, some scientific concerns are beginning to emerge.

Endocrine disruptors have become a major issue in environmental health discussions. Found in certain plastics, pesticides, cosmetics, textiles, and food packaging, these chemical substances can interfere with the body’s hormonal system and potentially affect human health. Over the past two decades, scientific publications on the subject have increased significantly. Yet regulation continues to move slowly,